<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Political News NOW! &#187; why</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politics.morenewsnow.com/keyword/why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politics.morenewsnow.com</link>
	<description>All the news you could want</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 20:45:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why Don&#8217;t White Audiences Go See Black Movies? &#124;</title>
		<link>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/05/11/why-dont-white-audiences-go-see-black-movies/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/05/11/why-dont-white-audiences-go-see-black-movies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 17:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>News Gatherer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audiences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[go]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[see]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/05/11/why-dont-white-audiences-go-see-black-movies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 So a small image that B does not seem to be something difficult brings all messages visually, making it highly subversive. We are in strange places. Some issues &#8211; especially related crimes &#8211; are better suited for expression, black and white. They seem to be anything but a lot. &#34;A: In general, are the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a  href="http://politics.morenewsnow.com/files/2011/05/why-dont-white-audiences-go-see-black-movies-.jpg" class="thickbox no_icon" rel="gallery-3844" title="Why Don't White Audiences Go See Black Movies? |"><img src="http://politics.morenewsnow.com/files/2011/05/why-dont-white-audiences-go-see-black-movies--150x150.jpg" class="alignright" title="Why Don't White Audiences Go See Black Movies? |" alt="Why Don't White Audiences Go See Black Movies? |" width="150" /></a>
<p> So a small image that B does not seem to be something difficult brings all messages visually, making it highly subversive. We are in strange places. Some issues &#8211; especially related crimes &#8211; are better suited for expression, black and white. They seem to be anything but a lot. &quot;A: In general, are the graphics. </p>
<p><span id="more-3844"></span></p>
<p><b>Related Stories</b>
<ul></ul></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/05/11/why-dont-white-audiences-go-see-black-movies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Newt Could Win</title>
		<link>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/05/11/why-newt-could-win/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/05/11/why-newt-could-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 09:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>News Gatherer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[could]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[win]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/05/11/why-newt-could-win/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 Obama birth certificate long, tornadoes in Alabama, a series of economic relations and so on. But coverage of Bin Laden (right) dominated the news, and there is no doubt that most of the movements in the polls Obama was due. Assessment of Obama in Gallup tracking improved from 46 percent before the announcement of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a  href="http://politics.morenewsnow.com/files/2011/05/why-newt-could-win.jpg" class="thickbox no_icon" rel="gallery-3842" title="Why Newt Could Win"><img src="http://politics.morenewsnow.com/files/2011/05/why-newt-could-win-150x150.jpg" class="alignright" title="Why Newt Could Win" alt="Why Newt Could Win" width="150" /></a>
<p> Obama birth certificate long, tornadoes in Alabama, a series of economic relations and so on. But coverage of Bin Laden (right) dominated the news, and there is no doubt that most of the movements in the polls Obama was due. Assessment of Obama in Gallup tracking improved from 46 percent before the announcement of Bin Laden to a maximum of 52 percent, before increasing to 51 percent, where it now resides. Other things are going &#8211; the release of Mr. rebounds attraction is that they seem easy to quantify. </p>
<p><span id="more-3842"></span>
<p> Obama&#39;s numbers would be like if it had not bin Laden. It could be worse &#8211; and look to the red line in the table below. If this scenario emerges, the experts conclude that it is likely to rebound Laden &quot;Bin was short-lived. I do not know, however, is that Mr. </p>
<p> Obama scores have been improving, with or without him. Obama presidency together, and the rebound may appear as if it had never disappeared &#8211; when in reality, the killing of Bin Laden were a relatively minor factor, and kill Bin Laden could be seen as Mr. convert this scenario, the conventional wisdom is exactly the opposite. </p>
<p> Since most people who pass a vote to reelect the president, increased the number of Obama with a gain of one percentage point approval rating, which is still available after the initial bounce is fading. He suggested &#8211; and to be clear, this is just a guess &#8211; that the death of Bin Laden could be part of Obama&#39;s vote in November 2012 by one percentage point, while the decrease of his Republican opponent on the same margin. </p>
<p>httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBNzyxjf_Hg&amp;feature=youtube_gdata
<p><b>Related Stories</b>
<ul></ul></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/05/11/why-newt-could-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Obama Should Not Have Released His Full Birth Certificate?Yet</title>
		<link>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/04/29/why-obama-should-not-have-released-his-full-birth-certificateyet/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/04/29/why-obama-should-not-have-released-his-full-birth-certificateyet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>News Gatherer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certificateyet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[full]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[have]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[his]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[released]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[should]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/04/29/why-obama-should-not-have-released-his-full-birth-certificateyet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ It was not good enough &#34;to stop women who wanted to see a long-term certificate, which is not normally provided by the government. There have been voices calling for Obama present a birth certificate since the beginning of his first presidential campaign. In Indeed, Obama has provided a copy of which is apparently defined [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> It was not good enough &quot;to stop women who wanted to see a long-term certificate, which is not normally provided by the government. There have been voices calling for Obama present a birth certificate since the beginning of his first presidential campaign. In Indeed, Obama has provided a copy of which is apparently defined as a birth certificate in abbreviated form in 2008, according to a press conference in general, condescending April 27. </p>
<p><span id="more-3760"></span>
<p> Even Donald Trump jumped the train out of control, this movement has not yet seem to go anywhere. But adding to their relatively large odious personalities and celebrities of the problem seems to be calcium Obama needed to find his long-term certificate, which was released Wednesday. Not surprisingly, even those who do not, I think, is greater than the extract of birth certificate. </p>
<p> No time travel or teleportation, there&#39;s no way Obama could be anywhere, but born in Hawaii. Almost everyone is willing to accept that these things exist, but somehow the politicians and the media have been dragged into this sterile debate. This left me even more disappointed than usual with the level of debate in American politics. Trump also said he was proud that his efforts have led to Obama present a birth certificate. </p>
<p> Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick said this debate a new low in American politics, and I would not have said it better. After seeing the story unfolds this week, I had to do something, try not to do and I agree with a politician. The movement represents the Birthe of xenophobia that simply should not exist in our society. </p>
<p> This really should complain about is the failure of Trump and his colleagues birthers respect the intelligence of the American people. We know better than spending a few weeks to discuss issues no. We know the economy is in chaos. We know better than to think that Obama&#39;s mother may have somehow given birth to a child abroad, while she was in Hawaii. Needless to say he had more important things to talk about this week, because there is always more important things to talk about attacks on inaccurate information. But when political leaders and the media agree that we are more interested in Donald Trump&#39;s Delusions of a serious problem, we lose the ability to participate in a constructive political conversation. </p>
<p><b>Related Stories</b>
<ul></ul></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/04/29/why-obama-should-not-have-released-his-full-birth-certificateyet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bernanke&#8217;s Press Conference: Why The Fed Chairman Won&#8217;t Reveal Anything</title>
		<link>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/04/28/bernankes-press-conference-why-the-fed-chairman-wont-reveal-anything/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/04/28/bernankes-press-conference-why-the-fed-chairman-wont-reveal-anything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>News Gatherer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bernankes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chairman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reveal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wont]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/04/28/bernankes-press-conference-why-the-fed-chairman-wont-reveal-anything/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 Maybe all the enthusiasm of the media comes not from what happens at the meeting, but what happens next: the first chairman, Ben Bernanke, gave a press conference. Instead, the press conference will almost certainly help to clarify what we know about his statements, not to disclose the information. While journalists may be pleased [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a  href="http://politics.morenewsnow.com/files/2011/04/bernankes-press-conference-why-the-fed-chairman-wont-reveal-anything.jpg" class="thickbox no_icon" rel="gallery-3749" title="Bernanke's Press Conference: Why The Fed Chairman Won't Reveal Anything"><img src="http://politics.morenewsnow.com/files/2011/04/bernankes-press-conference-why-the-fed-chairman-wont-reveal-anything-150x150.jpg" class="alignright" title="Bernanke's Press Conference: Why The Fed Chairman Won't Reveal Anything" alt="Bernanke's Press Conference: Why The Fed Chairman Won't Reveal Anything" width="150" /></a>
<p> Maybe all the enthusiasm of the media comes not from what happens at the meeting, but what happens next: the first chairman, Ben Bernanke, gave a press conference. Instead, the press conference will almost certainly help to clarify what we know about his statements, not to disclose the information. While journalists may be pleased to present the issues of lead central banker, not too juicy. </p>
<p><span id="more-3749"></span>
<p> But the press conference was billed as an opportunity to explain the latest quarterly forecasts of the FOMC Bernanke. Usually do not come until the Fed provides to its smallest details in a few weeks after the meeting. But what we can even Wednesday, the FOMC new economic forecasts. Therefore, these projections could provide &quot;prompt. </p>
<p><b>Related Stories</b>
<ul></ul></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/04/28/bernankes-press-conference-why-the-fed-chairman-wont-reveal-anything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Public Overwhelmingly Wants It: Why Is Taxing The Rich So Hard?</title>
		<link>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/04/24/the-public-overwhelmingly-wants-it-why-is-taxing-the-rich-so-hard/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/04/24/the-public-overwhelmingly-wants-it-why-is-taxing-the-rich-so-hard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>News Gatherer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[is]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overwhelmingly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[so]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/04/24/the-public-overwhelmingly-wants-it-why-is-taxing-the-rich-so-hard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 In other words, Wall Street has to share the pain. It is simply impossible. If this is the case, Wall Street has to do their part to solve the problem. Suppose the S &#38; P announcement serves as a proxy for the impact of Wall Street in a political stalemate in Washington. So if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a  href="http://politics.morenewsnow.com/files/2011/04/the-public-overwhelmingly-wants-it-why-is-taxing-the-rich-so-hard.jpg" class="thickbox no_icon" rel="gallery-3715" title="The Public Overwhelmingly Wants It: Why Is Taxing The Rich So Hard?"><img src="http://politics.morenewsnow.com/files/2011/04/the-public-overwhelmingly-wants-it-why-is-taxing-the-rich-so-hard-150x150.jpg" class="alignright" title="The Public Overwhelmingly Wants It: Why Is Taxing The Rich So Hard?" alt="The Public Overwhelmingly Wants It: Why Is Taxing The Rich So Hard?" width="150" /></a>
<p> In other words, Wall Street has to share the pain. It is simply impossible. If this is the case, Wall Street has to do their part to solve the problem. Suppose the S &amp; P announcement serves as a proxy for the impact of Wall Street in a political stalemate in Washington. So if Wall Street really wants to solve Washington and their lobbyists demanding an end to Bush&#39;s tax cuts for the rich and tax reform turnover of businesses run by the government. Instead, the solution to our ills Republican deficit is a drastic reduction of public spending dramatically negative consequences for U.S. security and the network is also likely to reject at the polls should not be implemented. One of the key &#8211; perhaps the key &#8211; the obstacles to an agreement between Republicans and Democrats is the reluctance of Republicans to take into account any increase in revenue under a &quot;grand bargain&quot; that would combine spending cuts and a tax increase in one package. </p>
<p><span id="more-3715"></span>
<p> We keep hearing that the budget debate has two main parts: The President and the Democrats want to reduce the budget deficit primarily by increasing taxes on the rich and the reduction in military spending, but not to privatize certain disease. On the other side is Paul Ryan, a Republican, and the right who want to reduce the deficit through privatization of Medicare and cutting programs for the poorest Americans while cutting taxes for the rich. </p>
<p> In particular, Obama wants to leave the Bush rate for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans expire in late 2012. If there is one aspect of the deficit reduction plan that Obama said last week that Republicans in Congress on the subject, is likely to appeal to higher rates of tax on the wealthiest Americans. </p>
<p> Perhaps, now more beautiful than Gingrich as president came in March 1995, when he recovered the entire House Republican caucus behind the idea of ​​eliminating the deficit within seven years. The graph shows the Clinton deficit-based. What changed this bleak picture? Newt Gingrich, and the company &#8211; for all its faults &#8211; have received virtually no credit for balancing the budget. And 1993 &#8211; the year of the giant tax increase Clinton &#8211; it was the turning point deficit in the war, either. However, today&#39;s surplus is partly a byproduct of the crossroads of the Republicans to end 30 years of red ink. In 1995, two years after the tax increase, the baseline of the budget submitted by the Chairman of the Board of Management and Budget, a nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office expects that 200 billion dollar deficit in the eyes. </p>
<p> Perhaps, now more beautiful than Gingrich as president came in March 1995, when he recovered the entire House Republican caucus behind the idea of ​​eliminating the deficit within seven years. Newt Gingrich, and the company &#8211; for all its faults &#8211; have received virtually no credit for balancing the budget. However, today&#39;s surplus is partly a byproduct of the crossroads of the Republicans to end 30 years of red ink. </p>
<p><b>Related Stories</b>
<ul></ul></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/04/24/the-public-overwhelmingly-wants-it-why-is-taxing-the-rich-so-hard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pawlenty Why Its Good To Be No. 2</title>
		<link>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/04/21/pawlenty-why-its-good-to-be-no-2/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/04/21/pawlenty-why-its-good-to-be-no-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 05:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>News Gatherer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[be]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[its]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pawlenty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/04/21/pawlenty-why-its-good-to-be-no-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ (It calls for repeal of the repeal of the military Do not Ask, Do not Tell policy.) So wide. More importantly, Pawlenty a large number of poor is not an extremist (Michele Bachmann, Rick Santorum, and Sarah Palin). Pawlenty resort, a good guy from the land of 10,000 lakes &#34;, to experience independent voters. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> (It calls for repeal of the repeal of the military Do not Ask, Do not Tell policy.) So wide. More importantly, Pawlenty a large number of poor is not an extremist (Michele Bachmann, Rick Santorum, and Sarah Palin). Pawlenty resort, a good guy from the land of 10,000 lakes &quot;, to experience independent voters. Pawlenty is the perfect man to fall back. Replace all the other candidates on the list to clear their debts, and Pawlenty is the last man. &quot;It&#39;s hard to name people who love him ..&quot; Not a good ol lobby privileged child (Haley Barbour). It is not a former administration official Obama (Jon Huntsman). The rebel No (Newt Gingrich). &quot;It is especially desired by the game,&quot; said Republican strategist Doug Heye. And now, the tea party to participate in a meeting in February, asked the activists to &quot;stand&quot; and the religious right . It is not Romney. </p>
<p><span id="more-3684"></span></p>
<p>httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2u3FIa-q0M&amp;feature=youtube_gdata
<p><b>Related Stories</b>
<ul>
<li><a  href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20110419/us_time/httpswamplandtimecom20110418fivereasonsnottocountpalinoutfor2012xidrssfullnationyahoo" target="_blank">Five Reasons Not to Count Sarah Palin Out in 2012 &#8211; YAHOO</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/04/21/pawlenty-why-its-good-to-be-no-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So Be It: Why Americans Shouldn?t Be Surprised By The Republican Agenda</title>
		<link>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/03/27/so-be-it-why-americans-shouldnt-be-surprised-by-the-republican-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/03/27/so-be-it-why-americans-shouldnt-be-surprised-by-the-republican-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>News Gatherer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[be]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shouldnt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[so]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surprised]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/03/27/so-be-it-why-americans-shouldnt-be-surprised-by-the-republican-agenda/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 Older Americans do not like the idea of ​​gay marriage. The issue of gay rights is more of a millstone around the neck of the Republican Party for years to come. Over time, the public (if the trend continues, as is likely), it will become more favorable to the idea &#8211; and those who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a  href="http://politics.morenewsnow.com/files/2011/03/so-be-it-why-americans-shouldnt-be-surprised-by-the-republican-agenda.jpg" class="thickbox no_icon" rel="gallery-3519" title="So Be It: Why Americans Shouldn?t Be Surprised By The Republican Agenda"><img src="http://politics.morenewsnow.com/files/2011/03/so-be-it-why-americans-shouldnt-be-surprised-by-the-republican-agenda-150x150.jpg" class="alignright" title="So Be It: Why Americans Shouldn?t Be Surprised By The Republican Agenda" alt="So Be It: Why Americans Shouldn?t Be Surprised By The Republican Agenda" width="150" /></a>
<p> Older Americans do not like the idea of ​​gay marriage. The issue of gay rights is more of a millstone around the neck of the Republican Party for years to come. Over time, the public (if the trend continues, as is likely), it will become more favorable to the idea &#8211; and those who fight against it are seen as increasingly out of touch. The &quot;uprising in his own trap,&quot; a phrase to mind. You should not let the Democrats of trying, however. Republicans, even the youngest surprising number, to approve the concept. Look at the Republicans now are trying to avoid the problem (and avoid even a vote on it) is certainly a reversal of Republican electoral efforts to push against gay marriage in 1990 to encourage their voters to turn to surveys. Younger Americans do not care a bit. &quot;More than any other&quot; hot &quot;social issue, gay rights is clearly a generational problem. It is certainly ironic, given that all social and political struggles has been exploited for so long (and, I must say, with success) by the Republican Party. </p>
<p><span id="more-3519"></span>
<p> This problem will be a great race in 2012, Obama has launched. But as a recent poll by NBC and shown, to present a list of two dozen ways to fight the deficit, then, to &quot;establish a surcharge on millionaires.&quot; This idea was supported by a surprising result. This means that Congress will meet again before the end of 2012. The third issue is the Democrats are always ahead of the imposition of a surtax on millionaires. It was an act of political courage, because. The conventional wisdom in Washington is that no one is elected on a platform of raising taxes last December, Obama has a deal with Republicans to extend the Bush tax cuts, the richest Americans &#8211; two years. </p>
<p> This means that the chances of passage are probably minimal. But this does not mean he is not worthy of groping. And &quot;there is no doubt also be approved by the House &#8211; or even get a vote anyway. This bill, however, has been introduced in the House. It&#39;s pretty hard to ignore a problem that eight out of 10 Americans agree, and if Democrats can get the Republicans on the defensive in the original question, which can only help in the political landscape next year. No doubt, defines the fight will happen next year (in the center presidential campaign), while Democrats argue for your side. </p>
<p> Even in the mortgage, there are many Republican state attorneys general, who can not keep all transactions in the Obama combined. It&#39;s pretty standard, no matter which party is the party off right now. But again, this does not mean that Democrats should not go beyond efforts like these that can help define the agenda of his party for the next two years. The Republicans certainly have the numbers to the Democratic Congress to block the accounts, whether to stay together. Due to their minority status in the House, Democrats are reduced to the old tactic of creating the questions to embarrass the Republicans (who does not fight to keep the votes, including the questions). </p>
<p><b>Related Stories</b>
<ul></ul></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/03/27/so-be-it-why-americans-shouldnt-be-surprised-by-the-republican-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evangelical Shift On Gays: Why &#8216;clobber Scriptures&#8217; Are Losing Ground</title>
		<link>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/03/27/evangelical-shift-on-gays-why-clobber-scriptures-are-losing-ground/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/03/27/evangelical-shift-on-gays-why-clobber-scriptures-are-losing-ground/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>News Gatherer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[are]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clobber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evangelical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[losing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scriptures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/03/27/evangelical-shift-on-gays-why-clobber-scriptures-are-losing-ground/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ These notices can find an audience among young evangelists who travel on the rights of gays and lesbians. If the Christian institution does not recognize this change and adjust their rhetoric, leaders may find his new congregation at first to defend their churches. In his new book, The Fall to Grace: a revolution of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> These notices can find an audience among young evangelists who travel on the rights of gays and lesbians. If the Christian institution does not recognize this change and adjust their rhetoric, leaders may find his new congregation at first to defend their churches. In his new book, The Fall to Grace: a revolution of God, self and society, the younger Bakker made the case that Christians should reconsider its position on homosexuality. </p>
<p><span id="more-3513"></span>
<p> Bakker, who is right and divorced, said that religious people have too much time beating selective scriptures used to condemn gays and lesbians. But before you say I told you, consider this: Seafood Restaurants, cutting their favorite tattoos were also prohibited by the old religious law .. a capital crime, too, said Bakker. The simple fact is that the references in the Old Testament in Leviticus treat homosexuality as a sin. A closer look at the teachings of the history of the entire Bible, he says, takes us away from that position. Mr. </p>
<p> However, the younger Bakker can be something of a bell. Brian McLaren, best-selling author and founder of the emerging church movement, headed toward the affirmation of gay and lesbian youth in his book of 2010, a new kind of Christianity: Ten questions that are transforming the faith. Condemns the Christian obsession with sexuality and encourages them to build a more honest and Christian anthropology solid. icons of Christian music Jennifer Knapp and Ray Boltz came out of the closet last year and asked his fans to reconsider their views. First, it is not the only evangelical relief requires a big tent approach to sexuality. </p>
<p><b>Related Stories</b>
<ul></ul></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/03/27/evangelical-shift-on-gays-why-clobber-scriptures-are-losing-ground/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Do People Like Ronald Reagan So Much?</title>
		<link>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/03/23/why-do-people-like-ronald-reagan-so-much/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/03/23/why-do-people-like-ronald-reagan-so-much/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 02:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>News Gatherer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[do]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[like]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[much]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[so]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/03/23/why-do-people-like-ronald-reagan-so-much/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 Unemployment has increased, but not as much as some expected. The UK is starting to produce and export new things, and has been true. The manufacturing sector began to recover, thanks to a weaker pound. However, Britain&#39;s economy remains in stasis. 

Related Stories

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a  href="http://politics.morenewsnow.com/files/2011/03/why-do-people-like-ronald-reagan-so-much.jpg" class="thickbox no_icon" rel="gallery-3494" title="Why Do People Like Ronald Reagan So Much?"><img src="http://politics.morenewsnow.com/files/2011/03/why-do-people-like-ronald-reagan-so-much-150x150.jpg" class="alignright" title="Why Do People Like Ronald Reagan So Much?" alt="Why Do People Like Ronald Reagan So Much?" width="150" /></a>
<p> Unemployment has increased, but not as much as some expected. The UK is starting to produce and export new things, and has been true. The manufacturing sector began to recover, thanks to a weaker pound. However, Britain&#39;s economy remains in stasis. </p>
<p><span id="more-3494"></span></p>
<p><b>Related Stories</b>
<ul></ul></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/03/23/why-do-people-like-ronald-reagan-so-much/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Offer Lame Brain Reasons Why Americans Shouldn?t Have Safe Roads</title>
		<link>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/03/07/republicans-offer-lame-brain-reasons-why-americans-shouldnt-have-safe-roads/</link>
		<comments>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/03/07/republicans-offer-lame-brain-reasons-why-americans-shouldnt-have-safe-roads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 10:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>News Gatherer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[have]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reasons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shouldnt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/03/07/republicans-offer-lame-brain-reasons-why-americans-shouldnt-have-safe-roads/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 A federal worker who does their job during a government shutdown can be convicted of a crime and sentenced to 2 years in prison and a $5000 fine although some exceptions can be made when the job is determined to be critical to the survival of the country. Don&#8217;t blame unions or federal workers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a  href="http://politics.morenewsnow.com/files/2011/03/republicans-offer-lame-brain-reasons-why-americans-shouldnt-have-safe-roads.jpg" class="thickbox no_icon" rel="gallery-3379" title="Republicans Offer Lame Brain Reasons Why Americans Shouldn?t Have Safe Roads"><img src="http://politics.morenewsnow.com/files/2011/03/republicans-offer-lame-brain-reasons-why-americans-shouldnt-have-safe-roads-150x150.jpg" class="alignright" title="Republicans Offer Lame Brain Reasons Why Americans Shouldn?t Have Safe Roads" alt="Republicans Offer Lame Brain Reasons Why Americans Shouldn?t Have Safe Roads" width="150" /></a>
<p> A federal worker who does their job during a government shutdown can be convicted of a crime and sentenced to 2 years in prison and a $5000 fine although some exceptions can be made when the job is determined to be critical to the survival of the country. Don&#8217;t blame unions or federal workers for this.  Learn some facts.  What this and other articles have failed to mention is that some of the back pay the last time went to just that type of employee.  In the latter case employees can be forced to work without pay or risk losing their job.</p>
<p><span id="more-3379"></span>
<p>who&#8217;s paying for that?. spending cuts are needed, dems dont want to see the spending that got them the few votes they get taken away even if it is something that can be done without. there ya go, REEAALL democracy in action for ya! dont worry, in part you can thank your local democrap, and fleebagger&#8217;s who blow the union boss in the back alley. whats more important? you want someething done, it&#8217;s getting done, and so far to date since the nov election we have seen a new party arise &#8220;fleebaggers&#8221;, and dems who threaten to hold the nation along with unions hostage. but when the dems start cramming crap spending down out throats its ok? thats what i dont get with some of you, its ok for 1 party to do something but not the other. might be the best place to look for them IF there is a shutdown, i hear in illinois they are running out of alley&#8217;s in safe neighborhoods so they got hotel rooms.</p>
<p>Actually putting out a plan that will cost us more now, but get us out of debt in the long run without destroying what we have rebuild from the bush years was pretty brave. Especially with all the millionaire crybabies whining about union workers, the tea party unamericans who want to tear everything down, the no compromise gop and the duped fox watcher.</p>
<p> The entire 2011 budget should have been passed and signed into law last year, but the Democrats in Congress decided not to do so. The GOP led House has passed the bill funding the 2011 budget. The GOP led House has made offers to the Senate about another Continuing Resolution (CR) to extend the deadline to mid-March so the Senate can take the time it needs to debate the House bill.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been running under these Continuing Resolutions because Congress last year could not find it in them to get a budget passed. During the lame duck session, Harry Reid attempted to pass an omnibus bill that would have funded the government through fiscal 2011, but it was so stuffed with pork, even the Democratic leadership in the Senate had to blush and walk away from that one. Congress must appropriate the funds. That bill lasted about 24 hours before Harry withdrew the bill and passed the current CR the government is currently operating under, and will expire next week.</p>
<p> But lets extend your logic out.  Tax cuts don&#8217;t add to deficits, only spending does. This is specious logic at best.  DAMN those republicans!  I mean we&#8217;d all be unemployed and taxed into poverty, but we would have a surplus!.  If the republicans had only allowed the democrats to increase taxes by 2.6 trillion, we would have a 1 trillion dollar surplus.</p>
<p>The lamebrains who lead this &#8220;think tank&#8221; are going to have us all riding bicycles, if we can afford the tires, and have a job, to work. Worse than foolish, malfeasance!. The real deal is, we are being lead, by clueless wonders, who drag us kicking and screaming over a cliff of their incompetence. If you want to see the lights go out forever, just keep supporting the demos, who won&#8217;t play, unless it is only by their rules. There is no one policy enacted by this Administration that has been directed at freeing this country from slavery to oil cartels. There has only been further regulations/moratoriums, on fossil fuel choices for energy. Then we will have the pleasure of slaving for enough food, maybe not enough heat, for one day.</p>
</p>
<p>The back pay IS NOT GUARANTEED. I&#8217;m one of those federal employees and trust me, I am not looking on it as a paid holiday. Then even if it is given, it won&#8217;t arrive until some date in the future. That doesn&#8217;t help me pay my bills now. In preparation for a shutdown I have given up a great many things, like all Americans, to build a financial cushion to hopefully get me through. Thank god I have some savings, but I cannot afford to pay my rent, meet my financial obligations (including student loan payments to the government), and my utilities for more than 3 or 4 weeks since I live within my means and don&#8217;t have credit cards to float me.</p>
<p> You can&#8217;t have a strong America when the only strong ones are the wealthy and corporations.  They never have cared about working people, seniors, children, students.  After all there are more workers than there are rich people and corporations. Republicans would love it if Social Security and Medicare disappeared tomorrow.  Seems to me there needs to be balance and there is none now.  It&#8217;s not their constituency and that&#8217;s why this country is on a downward spiral.</p>
<p><b>Related Stories</b>
<ul></ul></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.morenewsnow.com/2011/03/07/republicans-offer-lame-brain-reasons-why-americans-shouldnt-have-safe-roads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
