posted
Jan 19, 2010 by News Gatherer
Coverage of the Martha Coakley-Scott Brown Senate race brings to mind Yogi Berra’s famous quip, “It’s déjà vu all over again.” Not because of Coakley claiming that Boston Red Sox great Curt Schilling was somehow a New York Yankees fan (more on that later) or even the apt comparison with the 1991 Harris Wofford-Dick Thornburgh special election which largely centered on health affliction (as Alex Isenstadt noted).Seeing Admiral Barack Obama reverse course and accomplish a last minute/last ditch effort to save the Coakley campaign brings back memories of November, back Obama put his prestige and political basic on the line in an unsuccessful attempt to save the gubernatorial campaigns of New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine and Virginia’s Creigh Deeds.
Since November, Obama’s poll numbers have alone fallen. Combined, those two elections were a stinging rebuke of the Obama Agenda–higher taxes, government control of health affliction and out of control spending. Coupled with the “perfect storm” that is Martha Coakley’s candidacy–a bad candidate running a bad campaign in a bad year for Democrats–and it may be shocking, but not altogether surprising that Scott Brown is in a position to win.
Now that is a position that is intolerable to us. What can one say to a closed minded being that alone hears the wind whistling between their ears? I absolutely wished the Admiral success. He has squandered all political basic and now seeks to drive a wedge added into the heart of the American people. All types of responses to you. All the bodies of many persuasions are turning on this calculated plan and saying as the great Howard Beale did ” I am mad as hell and not going to take this anymore”.
If it is not profitable for them, they won’t do it. Bodies don’t abhorrence Obama because of the color of his skin, that would be antic (almost as antic as you assertion that that is the case). People, generally, want to be personally governed as little as possible. I am not a Republican, but I am not a democrat. This being said, I just have to say that you seem to absolutely have no abstraction what you’re talking about. If you cannot grasp the implications of this let simply say that it is very 1984-esque. I side with whomever I believe is going to absolutely help the bodies of our nation in the best way possible. This is the abstraction aloft which our nation has become great, because we can innovate economically. He is pushing a healthcare bill that will not alone not work, but which disposes of the abstraction of ‘freedom of enterprise’. The bodies who abhorrence Obama have their own, legitimate reasons for hating the man. In his time in office he has able nothing good for the American people. The healthcare issue he’s proposing would put the life of every single American not in the hands of insurance companies (who could alone profit from the continued life of their clients) and puts those very lives in the hands of the government, which would accomplish decisions based on how much money it would amount them, and how much money that particular tax-payer is acceptable to contribute should he/she survive. So what you have is literally, a government that decides who lives, and who dies. Obama wants to restrict our ability as citizens to do this, he is demography a business abstraction (and one that absolutely matters) and putting it in the hands of the government.
To quote Leonardo da Vinci “Iron rusts from disuse, brackish water loses its purity and in cold acclimate becomes frozen; so does inaction sap the vigors of the mind”. You say that you’ve alone ever heard abhorrence from the mouths of right wingers? I’ve heard analogously little from them in terms of hate, back compared to snooty, pretentious, and arrogant liberals who abhorrence everyone who smokes a cigarette in a public park, who abhor bodies who drive cars that get fewer than 30 mpg, and who hate, absolutely and unconditionally republicans. And while Bush was no the best president, at least he took action, Obama breeds inaction and stagnation. The abhorrence that the democrats brought on Bush was far worse than anything republicans have put on Obama. Tell me, did the republicans ever claim that that abhorrence was based on the color of Bush’s skin? Did they claim that it was thrust aloft him because he hailed from Texas? No, of course they didn’t, to allude something so ludicrous would have been apparent absurd.
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfS-GIrLLCs&feature=youtube_gdata
Related Stories
You must be logged in to post a comment.